#MERGE UPDATED BRANCH TO MASTER GIT UPDATE#
#MERGE UPDATED BRANCH TO MASTER GIT MANUAL#
#MERGE UPDATED BRANCH TO MASTER GIT CODE#

The alternative process has the added benefit of being able to easily test your changes after the merge locally. This means we can use the GitHub functionality to merge it from the website!

#MERGE UPDATED BRANCH TO MASTER GIT UPDATE#

Now, after the merging is done, we can push back up to the same docs feature branch, and update our pull request with the merge already dealt with. This will cause the merge conflict, same as before.

He makes sure the local master is synced up with the remote one, then on the local branch used to generate the pull request, he just merges in the latest version of master. When talking through this process with my co-worker Yannick, he provided a slightly simpler process that he uses to get his pull requests into a mergeable state. Ok, so we went through how GitHub suggests you tackle the problem of merge conflicts.

#MERGE UPDATED BRANCH TO MASTER GIT MANUAL#

This is more work than the auto-merge, but with small feature changes, this manual process is typically the exception to how merging works and not the rule. Now, we can switch back to master to merge this PR into the main master branch.

#MERGE UPDATED BRANCH TO MASTER GIT CODE#

This step is particularly important if someone was modifying the same area of code as your PR. Once all of the conflicts have been resolved and the commits are made, it’s good practice to double check that none of the conflicts resulted in broken code. The rest of the merge is already in staging, so now I can commit the merge git commit -m 'merged master' Picking out what to keep is a decision only you can make – but I know you’ll make the right one. I modify the code until all of the conflicts are dealt with.The top section, before the equals chain is what was on the remote master branch before your changes came in. Here, I just have one file that needs attention: gruntfile.jsĪfter opening it up in my text editor, I look for the <<<< indicating a merge conflict. This should fail, and it should tell you which files you need to look at to resolve the conflict. Then switch back to the feature branch and merge in master git checkout docs Luckily, the instructions for getting started are right there and just a click away.įirst, make sure you have the latest master in your local repo. However, sometimes (and not often, honestly) the magic doesn’t quite work, and you need to return to the command line one final time for the merge. If you are lucky, the PR can be auto-merged, and you can do it right inside GitHub with just a few clicks! A good rule of thumb is to have one PR per issue. I typically like smaller PRs to bigger ones, so if I can justify splitting out additional suggestions into separate issues, I go that route. Once your pull request reviewer is satisfied with the changes, you’ll get the coveted +1 (or equivalent affirmative emoji), which means it’s time to get this thing merged!Īdditional suggestions, if you feel the scope is small enough, can be dealt with in a separate PR or added as another commit to the existing one. In this final (for now!) installment, we will merge our reviewed changes back into master. I knew we could do it! Last time, we looked at a few ways to review pull requests. We are in the homestretch with our git workflow walkthrough.

Merge updated branch to master git